Vaccination During Pregnancy – Untested, Unsafe and Recommended by the CDC

By Benjamin Rush

Below is a table of vaccinations which are recommended before, during and after pregnancy for American women. The table is from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) -the corrupt American Government body that has been implicated in colluding with pharmaceutical interests to cover up and suppress information on the link between vaccinations and autism (amongst other things).*

Please note that NONE of these vaccines have ever been tested for safety during pregnancy  and that since the US Government began recommending vaccines to pregnant women, the number of fetal deaths has exceeded postnatal deaths the first time ever. (Fetal and Perinatal Mortality: United States, 2013)

Australia also started to recommend vaccinations during pregnancy – even during the first trimester when moms are supposed to avoid exposure to any and all toxins and drugs.

Are millions of children being killed and permanently injured in the womb where their parents will never suspect the involvement of vaccines? Will children who are born with multiple birth defects and congenital issues or being miscarried hours or days after their mothers were vaccinated ever be counted in the official toll of vaccine victims?

If you know of someone who is currently pregnant or is thinking of getting pregnant sometime in the future, please share this information with them.

If you are a pediatrician, obstetrician or other health professional, please become informed about the risks of the procedures you recommend. Primum non nocere – Firstly, do no harm.pregnancy chart

Please note: Blog posts are opinion pieces which represent the views of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the nocompulsoryvaccination blog. This blog is a forum, support and information site and outlet for discussion about the relative benefits and risks of vaccinations in particular – and medical procedures in general. We do not provide medical advice but believe that everyone has the opportunity and the obligation to do their own research before making decisions for their families. The information we provide (including your personal review of the references we cite) should be taken in conjunction with a range of other data, including that obtained from the government, your health care provider and/or other medical source material to assist you in developing the knowledge required to make informed health choices.

Benjamin Rush is nocompulsoryvaccination’s USA Correspondent and the owner of the Fans of the AVN Facebook page.

Does the flu vaccine really reduce the risk of premature birth?

Here we have a media report on a ‘study’ that has been adjusted (a euphemism for the numbers being played with until the researchers got the results they set out to get) to show that there is a 70% lower risk of premature birth in babies born to mothers who got the flu vaccine during flu season than mothers who didn’t.

First of all, in any random group of 400 women, how many would have babies born prematurely?

In the US, the March of Dimes has noted that there has been a 20% increase in the incidence of premature births since 1990. Let’s see – what else has happened over these years? Oh, right! We have gone from 18 vaccines for children to over 60 vaccines for children…
“Preterm birth is the leading cause of death in the first month of life in the United States.  The preterm birth rate has increased about 20 percent since 1990, and costs the nation more than $26 billion a year, according to the Institute of Medicine report issued in July 2006.” http://www.marchofdimes.com/aboutus/22684_42538.asp

So here we have a group of 400 families – one would assume that half of them got the flu vaccine and the other half didn’t? Now, we have an even smaller cohort to look at. Out of a random group of 200 women, how many would be expected to have a premature birth or a low birth weight child? How many of these women smoked during their pregnancy? How many took pharmaceutical drugs? How many of them miscarried within a short time of receiving the vaccine vs miscarriages in the unvaccinated? Did they look at the outcome in the babies – were they more or less likely to have behavioural or developmental issues? Too many variables – too little information.

But based on this one ‘study’, we are told that using a flu vaccine that contains 24.5 mcg of neurotoxic, carcinogenic, immune system destroying mercury – a vaccine that has never been tested for its safety, efficacy or teratogenicity – can actually reduce the incidence of both preterm birth and low birth weight.

Let’s not forget that the United States, which has more vaccines given to children than any other country in the world, is now number 47 out of the top 50 countries when it comes to infant mortality, trailing behind many developing nations. Australia is not doing that much better when it comes to that issue though we do not use as many vaccines as the US does – yet.

The only real way to study these vaccines is to compare the overall picture in a cohort of completely unvaccinated people with a cohort of the fully vaccinated. Scientists have refused to do this study and it is perplexing to understand why – unless they are afraid that the result they get may be the one that organisations like the AVN suspect – that unsafe and untested vaccines have been harming and killing people for centuries while the government and the medical community fiddled.

Articles like this one are just thinly-masked pharmaceutical advertising campaigns.

Sydney Morning Herald – Body and Soul – 17 July 2011